Front and center on page 9 can be seen a table, “Knowledge Continuity/Transfer Options for Experts”. This is the key. This is where a stunning lack of curiosity has emerged on the part of both the people who would be thus empowered and technologists themselves. Fluidity constitutes a major development. Forget fake, automated pretentions to knowledge, we are dealing with fluid, direct, and powerful expression of human knowledge via digital networks. The enthusiasm gap is palpable and horrific.

This comes at great cost ot humanity.

Here is a plan based on establishment of capacity by means of three centers, one in Europe--Poland to be specific--the United States, and in Southeast Asia--not surprisingly in Indonesia, where the tradition of success was upheld. The point is that both knowledge and authority need to be reinforced by empowering people. Page 10 of the Policy Brief provides details about the prospects, not only in health, but in climate science and practice, all Sustainable Development Goals, in public finance, and in detailed unique national authority and finance models.

This is a step beyond Gutenberg. Documents contain much that needs to be converted to digital forms that can then be used. This needs to be done by the authors and the experts themselves. Think of the music model in this respects. The Beethovens and the Mozarts of the musical world had all that they needed to communicate with the performers and eventually to the audiences. This is true in all cases--the knowledge and the details need to be provided generally without interpretation, simplification, or misunderstanding by a class of technologists with mixed motives.

This is an important aspect in the development of more legitimate governance in public and private contexts. Technology can and must be brought to bear to express and support valid truths and legitimate action all users and beneficiaries of their systems.